In Hanzlik v. Birach, Jr., et al., the Eastern District of Virginia granted the plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees petition, finding the amount of attorneys’ fees requested to be reasonable. The opinion can be found here. More after the break.
Contributed by Eric A. Welter.Posts Tagged ‘4th Circuit’
Eastern District Rules on Attorneys’ Fees in FLSA Case
Tuesday, August 3rd, 20104th Circuit Reverses Dismissal of Sexual Harassment Case
Sunday, July 18th, 2010In EEOC v. Fairbrook Medical Clinic, the Fourth Circuit reversed the grant of summary judgment for the defendant on the plaintiff’s hostile work environment claim. More after the break.
Contributed by Eric A. Welter.4th Circuit Remands Discrimination Case For Trial
Saturday, May 1st, 2010In Merritt v. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that the plaintiff had produced sufficient evidence of discriminatory intent to create a genuine issue of material fact, precluding summary judgment for the employer. A copy of the opinion is here. More after the break.
4th Circuit Reverses $10 Million Punitive Damage Verdict
Monday, March 8th, 2010In Worldwide Network Services, LLC v. DynCorp International, LLC, the Fourth Circuit reversed a $10 million punitive damages award in favor of the plaintiff on the grounds that there was no evidence that the defendant acted with the knowledge that its conduct violated federal law. Our prior post about the jury verdict can be found here. More after the break.
Contributed by Eric A. Welter.4th Circuit Allows De Novo Review Of SOX Appeal
Friday, January 15th, 2010In Stone v. Instrumentation Laboratory Co., a case of first impression, the Fourth Circuit addressed the issue of whether a Sarbanes-Oxley (“SOX”) whistleblower claimant has the right to a de novo review by a district court while the claim is pending on an administrative appeal. More after the break.
Fourth Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment In Failure To Promote Case
Thursday, December 31st, 2009In an unpublished opinion (Wesley v. Arlington County), the Fourth Circuit reversed the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the employer in a failure to promote case brought by a firefighter. More after the break.
Contributed by Eric A. Welter.4th Circuit Reverses Dismissal of Retaliation Claims Based on Twombly
Monday, December 28th, 2009In a recent unpublished opinion (Harman v. Unisys Corp.), the Fourth Circuit reversed the district court’s dismissal of an employee’s retaliation claims against her employer. The plaintiff, Kathryn Harman, brought suit against Unisys Corporation and several employees, alleging gender, age, and race discrimination and retaliation, as well as violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). More after the break.
Contributed by Eric A. Welter.4th Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment In Age Case
Thursday, November 19th, 2009In an unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit reversed the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendant employer on a discrimination claim brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). The case is Inman v. Klockner Pentaplast of America, Inc. More after the break.
Contributed by Eric A. Welter.4th Circuit Reverses Dismissal Of Race And Gender Harassment Suit
Monday, August 31st, 20094th Circuit Issues Borrowed Servant Decision
Friday, July 17th, 2009In Ladd v. Research Triangle Inst., the Fourth Circuit addressed the borrowed servant doctrine under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (LHCWA). More after the break.
4th Circuit Affirms Jury Award To Warden
Tuesday, July 14th, 2009In Anthony v. Ward, the Fourth Circuit affirmed a jury award of $510,000 to plaintiff Calvin Anthony, former warden of Lee Correctional Institution in South Carolina. The judgment by the federal district court found defendants Robert Ward and Charles Sheppard, officials of the South Carolina Department of Corrections (SCDC), guilty of civil conspiracy under South Carolina law. On appeal, the Fourth Circuit upheld the judgment, finding that the defendants conspired to force Anthony’s termination. More after the break.
Split Arises In Virginia On Employer Liability Insurance Exclusion
Wednesday, June 17th, 2009After a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia holding that a business insurance carrier must defend an employer after a workplace shooting leads to a negligence action by the employee’s estate (see article here), a split has arisen between the Eastern and Western Districts. According to the article, a decision from the Western District reaching the opposite conclusion is on appeal to the 4th Circuit.
Although this was not an EPLI case, it is a good reminder to employers to check for any applicable insurance coverage after any workplace “claim” arises. If there is an arguable basis for coverage, the employer should place the carrier on notice of the claim to protect its rights under the policy.
Contributed by Eric A. Welter.4th Circuit Decides Case on Finality of Federal EEOC Decisions
Thursday, June 4th, 2009The Fourth Circuit’s decision in Cochran v. Holder addresses the issue of when a decision by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) becomes “final” for the purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(c). The EEOC regulation allows federal employees to file a civil action for illegal discrimination by their employer within 90 days of a “final” adverse decision by the Commission. More after the break.
4th Circuit Affirms FMLA Interference and Retaliation Verdict
Friday, March 6th, 2009In Dotson v. Pfizer, Inc., the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding that Dotson’s employer had interfered with his right to leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) and had engaged in retaliation. The court also reversed the district court’s denial of an award for pre-judgment interest. The court’s opinion can be found here. More after the break.
Recent 4th Circuit Decisions of Interest
Wednesday, November 19th, 2008The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit — already famous for not publishing many of its decisions — has continued the trend this year with very few published decisions. Several recent employment law decisions, however, are published decisions and warrant comment here. We also note a recent unpublished decision that might be of interest.
