<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Laconic Law Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laconiclawblog.com</link>
	<description>Pithy Commentary On Employment Law In Virginia And Beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:45:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on EEOC Verdicts and Settlements &#8212; January 2010 by Preston Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2010/02/12/eeoc-verdicts-and-settlements-january-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-18417</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laconiclawblog.com/?p=739#comment-18417</guid>
		<description>What a shallow reason for the administrator(s) of that assisted living facility to fire someone for standing her faith. I feel sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a shallow reason for the administrator(s) of that assisted living facility to fire someone for standing her faith. I feel sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Amusing Search Terms by More Amusing Search Terms &#171; The Laconic Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/11/17/amusing-search-terms/comment-page-1/#comment-17327</link>
		<dc:creator>More Amusing Search Terms &#171; The Laconic Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laconiclawblog.com/?p=536#comment-17327</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Jersey Court Orders Return Of Emails Found On Employee Computer by DC Court Upholds Attorney-Client Privilege Of Emails Sent From Work &#171; The Laconic Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/09/14/new-jersey-court-orders-return-of-emails-found-on-employee-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-17317</link>
		<dc:creator>DC Court Upholds Attorney-Client Privilege Of Emails Sent From Work &#171; The Laconic Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laconiclawblog.com/?p=457#comment-17317</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New EEOC Enforcement Activity Against Use Of Credit History And Criminal Background In Hiring by Odds and Ends &#124; The Word on Employment Law</title>
		<link>http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/12/10/new-eeoc-enforcement-activity-against-use-of-credit-history-and-criminal-background-in-hiring/comment-page-1/#comment-17285</link>
		<dc:creator>Odds and Ends &#124; The Word on Employment Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laconiclawblog.com/?p=576#comment-17285</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act Issues by Keep your genes to yourself after this weekend &#124; ZDNet Healthcare &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/02/10/genetic-information-nondiscrimination-act-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-17025</link>
		<dc:creator>Keep your genes to yourself after this weekend &#124; ZDNet Healthcare &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welterlaw.com/blog/?p=373#comment-17025</guid>
		<description>[...] groups and insurers wanted the law&#8217;s implementation delayed. Lawyers are already going ka-ching. People who don&#8217;t like lawyers are wringing their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] groups and insurers wanted the law&#8217;s implementation delayed. Lawyers are already going ka-ching. People who don&#8217;t like lawyers are wringing their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 by Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) Effective November 21 &#171; The Laconic Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2008/05/01/genetic-information-nondiscrimination-act-of-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-17018</link>
		<dc:creator>Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) Effective November 21 &#171; The Laconic Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welterlaw.com/blog/?p=181#comment-17018</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act Issues by Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) Effective November 21 &#171; The Laconic Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/02/10/genetic-information-nondiscrimination-act-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-16978</link>
		<dc:creator>Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) Effective November 21 &#171; The Laconic Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welterlaw.com/blog/?p=373#comment-16978</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;The Most Oppressive Motion Ever Presented To A Superior Court&#8221; by Norman Solberg</title>
		<link>http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/10/12/the-most-oppressive-motion-ever-presented-to-a-superior-court/comment-page-1/#comment-16836</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman Solberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laconiclawblog.com/?p=470#comment-16836</guid>
		<description>As a former Fortune 500 General Counsel myself (long ago), I cannot understand the lapse in oversight by the UA legal department in allowing such work to be done by the Littler firm. Out of control and extremely counter-productive. There&#039;s a fee that should be slashed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a former Fortune 500 General Counsel myself (long ago), I cannot understand the lapse in oversight by the UA legal department in allowing such work to be done by the Littler firm. Out of control and extremely counter-productive. There&#8217;s a fee that should be slashed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;The Most Oppressive Motion Ever Presented To A Superior Court&#8221; by Mike</title>
		<link>http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/10/12/the-most-oppressive-motion-ever-presented-to-a-superior-court/comment-page-1/#comment-16806</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laconiclawblog.com/?p=470#comment-16806</guid>
		<description>1150 pages! Amazing.  On its face, that does not appear to be the counseling and problem solving for which attorneys should be retained.   Knowing that the judge has to read through that run on objection just as closely as opposing counsel, how could the attorney not think he/she would not be reprimanded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1150 pages! Amazing.  On its face, that does not appear to be the counseling and problem solving for which attorneys should be retained.   Knowing that the judge has to read through that run on objection just as closely as opposing counsel, how could the attorney not think he/she would not be reprimanded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Employees Fired For MySpace Comments Win Verdict by Lawrence E Handorf</title>
		<link>http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/10/01/employees-fired-for-myspace-comments-win-verdict/comment-page-1/#comment-16773</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence E Handorf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laconiclawblog.com/?p=465#comment-16773</guid>
		<description>Eric: Great article. Larry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric: Great article. Larry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recent Jury Verdicts and Settlements by Jeff Schrembs</title>
		<link>http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/06/05/recent-jury-verdicts-and-settlements-33/comment-page-1/#comment-15856</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Schrembs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welterlaw.com/blog/?p=424#comment-15856</guid>
		<description>GOD bless each and every Attorney, Judge, etc. who works on behalf of those who are (truly) disabled and/or disadvantaged.
Though we may never meet...your deeds leave a lasting legacy.
Thank you.
Jeffrey Schrembs
Disabled Persons Advocate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOD bless each and every Attorney, Judge, etc. who works on behalf of those who are (truly) disabled and/or disadvantaged.<br />
Though we may never meet&#8230;your deeds leave a lasting legacy.<br />
Thank you.<br />
Jeffrey Schrembs<br />
Disabled Persons Advocate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Maryland Flexible Leave Act by The Laconic Law Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Maryland Amends Flexible Leave Law</title>
		<link>http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2008/06/27/new-maryland-flexible-leave-act/comment-page-1/#comment-15822</link>
		<dc:creator>The Laconic Law Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Maryland Amends Flexible Leave Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welterlaw.com/blog/?p=222#comment-15822</guid>
		<description>[...] member, employer, employees, and leave with pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] member, employer, employees, and leave with pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No Mixed Motive Cases Under ADEA Says U.S. Supreme Court by Supreme Court Gives Employers Big Age Discrimination Victory &#124; The Word</title>
		<link>http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/06/18/no-mixed-motive-cases-under-adea-says-us-supreme-court/comment-page-1/#comment-15264</link>
		<dc:creator>Supreme Court Gives Employers Big Age Discrimination Victory &#124; The Word</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welterlaw.com/blog/?p=433#comment-15264</guid>
		<description>[...] Dan Schwartz, Jon Hyman, Delaware Employment Law Blog, Jottings By An Employer&#8217;s Lawyer, and The Laconic Law Blog.      var [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dan Schwartz, Jon Hyman, Delaware Employment Law Blog, Jottings By An Employer&#8217;s Lawyer, and The Laconic Law Blog.      var [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Whistleblower Protections Under the Stimulus Bill:  The McCaskill Amendment by Lindsey</title>
		<link>http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/03/24/new-whistleblower-protections-under-the-stimulus-bill-the-mccaskill-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-13882</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welterlaw.com/blog/?p=396#comment-13882</guid>
		<description>I thought you might be interested in this letter written by Army Corps of Engineers whistleblower Bunny Greenhouse, who was retaliated against after she testified to Congress last week.  Ms. Greenhouse is calling on all Americans to support whistleblower protection for federal employees.  To read her letter go to http://capwiz.com/whistleblowers/issues/alert/?alertid=13371836</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought you might be interested in this letter written by Army Corps of Engineers whistleblower Bunny Greenhouse, who was retaliated against after she testified to Congress last week.  Ms. Greenhouse is calling on all Americans to support whistleblower protection for federal employees.  To read her letter go to <a href="http://capwiz.com/whistleblowers/issues/alert/?alertid=13371836" rel="nofollow">http://capwiz.com/whistleblowers/issues/alert/?alertid=13371836</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recent Jury Verdicts and Settlements by Notable Blogging &#124; The Word</title>
		<link>http://laconiclawblog.com/index.php/2009/05/05/recent-jury-verdicts-and-settlements-31/comment-page-1/#comment-13214</link>
		<dc:creator>Notable Blogging &#124; The Word</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://welterlaw.com/blog/?p=409#comment-13214</guid>
		<description>[...] The Laconic Law Blog&#8217;s summary or recent jury verdicts and settlements (millions and millions); [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Laconic Law Blog&#8217;s summary or recent jury verdicts and settlements (millions and millions); [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
