About the author
Eric A. Welter is an employment lawyer and litigator with the Welter Law Firm, P.C. in Herndon, Virginia. He is licensed to practice law in Virginia, Maryland, Washington D.C., Texas and California.
The Welter Law Firm represents and advises employers on all aspects of the employment relationship and represents businesses in commercial and franchise litigation. The firm’s offices are located in Northern Virginia; Los Angeles, California; and Austin, Texas.
Join Our Email List
Archives by Date
April 2017 M T W T F S S « Jan 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
© Welter Law Firm, P.C.
"The Laconic Law Blog" is a trademark of Welter Law Firm, P.C.
Author Archives: Eric Welter
As more Americans have embraced a “mobile” technology culture, many employers have embraced the cultural shift and begun utilizing a remote workforce. Opinions regarding the benefits and drawbacks of the virtual office and remote workplace abound among workers and businesses … Continue reading
The Fifth Circuit recently issued a decision that impacts joint employer liability, perceived disability under ADAAA and the dangers of revisiting employee performance reviews. Michael Maslanka, a regular contributor to Texas Lawyer, wrote an article last month called, “L&E Plaintiff … Continue reading
Court Rulings Reiterate that Employers Should Review and Revise Best Practices for Drug-Free Workplace Programs
Employers have many reasons for requiring employees to submit to drug and/or alcohol testing, both as a part of pre-employment screenings, and as a condition for continued employment in the workplace.
Munoz Decision Grants California Employers Greater Clarity When Class Action Certification is Denied in Employee Lawsuits
It is well established under California law that an order denying class certification, leaving only the named plaintiff’s individual claims, is an appealable order under the “death knell” doctrine.
California Employee Class Action on Wages and Breaks Confirms Narrow Threshold for Federal Jurisdiction
On February 18, 2005, Congress enacted the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”), which significantly expanded federal diversity jurisdiction over many class actions. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d).
California employers tend to be a very aware and engaged community. After all, they need to be in a state as large, complex and highly regulated as California. Most employers in the state are likely very aware of the state’s requirements … Continue reading
The summer of 2015 continues to be a busy time for federal agencies with responsibility for regulating employment matters. The Department of Labor (DOL) and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued new interpretations of key employment principles that are … Continue reading
Employers’ hands are often bound when balancing workplace morale with their duty to accommodate employees with mental or behavioral health issues. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently clarified the limit of the employer’s duties in … Continue reading
Recently, the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) warned that it will investigate and take administrative action against employers who require employees to sign confidentiality agreements/statements prohibiting the employees from communicating the employer’s possible securities law violations to the SEC (i.e. whistleblowing).
New regulations pertaining to overtime pay proposed by the Obama administration may force many employers to correct a longstanding assumption about employee classification, particularly as they come to terms with changes that will significantly expand employee eligibility for overtime pay.
In a significant decision earlier this year, the Court of Appeals of Maryland found that employees performing work in Maryland on behalf of their Virginia employer may pursue claims for unpaid wages under the Maryland Wage Payment Collection Law (“MWPCL”) … Continue reading
In March 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a lower court’s decision and re-instated a pregnancy discrimination lawsuit brought against United Parcel Service (UPS). The case concerned a UPS employee who, upon becoming pregnant, was advised by her physician to … Continue reading
The Colorado Supreme Court ruled on June 15, 2015 that an employee of Dish Network who was terminated in 2010 for failing a company marijuana test was fired legally, despite the fact that Colorado law allows individuals to use marijuana … Continue reading
Any company that requires job applicants to complete an application and submit to a background investigation as part of the employment process should be familiar with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”).
In 2014, the Government of the District of Columbia (Washington DC) enacted the Wage Theft Prevention Amendment Act (WTPAA), which formally went into effect on February 26, 2015. The act made broad changes to Washington DC wage and hour laws, … Continue reading